About Me

My photo
Hi, I'm Victor! I'm currently studying at SIT Year 1 in Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering (Building Services). I'm a Christian, attending Heart of God Church.

Thursday, 29 November 2018

Critical Reflection on Presentation Showcase

I was involved in the 4th annual presentation showcase for SIE2016 Effective Communication as part of the committee member appointed by the lecturer Brad Blackstone. My role in the showcase was event photographer/videographer, where I took many photos of the different teams presenting and the audience, including the judges. It was a fantastic and successful showcase with everyone gave their best in making sure the whole thing ran smoothly.

However, it wasn’t easy as I thought. As a photographer, I do not own any camera. I must depend on cameras that both Eddie and Wendy brought. As such, I did not have ample time to familiarise myself with the camera, which might affect the quality of the photos. Another issue was the number of batteries available, which constraint the number of shots I could take. Nonetheless, I enjoyed myself and glad to be given the chance to be part of this.

I think the apparent reason why this showcase could be successful because everybody in the committee works well as a team. It was great to see that nobody shows any individualism. By having Kenyu as our leader was terrific, he led the team with clear communication and we could understand what was needed and responded well. However, I felt that we could have done better overall.

I think if we could standardize the problem of whether we should use mics, the whole flow of the showcase would be better. Furthermore, as committee members, we should have taken charge of the timing for the audience to cheer and clap. The cheering of the audience might be disrupting the flow when the presentation was ongoing. There were times when Dr. Moshood had to ask the audience to lower down their volume and I felt that’s supposed to be our job, especially when the judges were commenting. In this way, the whole showcase could be better than the actual.

Critical Reflection on Project Learning

Throughout the whole project, I realized the power of the team could make things possible. All of us have different skills and knowledge and we were able to do things that we can’t do alone. Individually, I learned a lot about my teammates in this project. The experience I had with working together with them allowed me to understand how as a team we should overcome adversity. For instance, when we were preparing our presentation, everyone might have different opinions on the parts we should present. I learned to step back and listened, realized that great communication includes being a great listener. There is a quote saying, “A good leader starts with being a good listener”, thus explained listening is an essential part of good communication. My biggest takeaway from this project is never the technical part but to be a good listener to others.

Critical Reflection on Module Learning

At the start of this module, I wrote about wanting to improve my overall English language so that I would be able to relay my thoughts and communicate better. After going through the past 13 weeks, I believed I can relay my thoughts and communicate better now, but I couldn’t say that I achieved my goals yet. I felt that my English wasn’t strong enough. I still struggled on many assignments, including the presentation, where I spent a lot of time practicing it. I even had some night that I stayed up late just to phrase my words better. But I’m grateful for the chance to improve my English overall, as I learned how to write a report effectively and further improved on being a team player. Nonetheless, I won’t stop continuing to raise my English language into a new level until I achieve my goals.

Thursday, 22 November 2018

Technical Report Draft 2

Proposed Solutions
What are waterless urinals?
Waterless urinals are normal looking urinals without a pipe for water intake. As the name suggested, waterless urinals do not require water to flush but instead, they are drain by gravity through the drain pipe. The waste will flow through the drain pipe connected to the building’s plumbing system and into the water treatment plant.


How does it work?
Waterless urinals consist of two main parts; the urinal bowl and the S-trap that contains the urinal cartridge and sealant which is connected to the buildings sewage system/ water treatment plant. When the user uses the urinal, the urine will flow down the s-pipe where it passes through the sealant allowing it to pass through the cartridge before flowing down to the sewage system.


Benefits
Below are some benefits of using waterless urinals.

Water Savings

Conventional urinals usually use 4 to 12 litres of water per flush. According to the Changi Airport website, to reduce the water consumption in the airport, they use the low-flush urinals instead. It is logical that low-flush urinal uses lesser water, with only about 0.5 litres of water used per flush and it helps to save up to at least 3.5 litres of water used. However, with the installation of waterless urinals, it can help to save 0.5 litres of water more than what low-flush had saved since it does not use any flushing water.

Improve Hygiene

Waterless urinals are designed such that any liquid in the urinals will dry out between uses to prevent bacteria and viruses from thriving.

Meet Environmental Goals

As waterless urinals do not require any water for flushing, this will eliminate water usage and also reduce CO2 emission. According to Changi Airport, they installed on-off sensors in selected areas which helps to reduce water usage by 66% from 6 liters per minute to 2 liters per minute. However, if they implement the no-flush urinals, water usage would be further reduced.
The average bladder holds between 300 to 400 ml of urine and the average cistern will flush between 9 to 15 litres of water into the sewer. All of that liquid has to be treated to the sewage plant. The treatment generates about 10 to 26 kgs of CO2 emission every year.  As our waterless urinals do not require 9 to 15 litres of water, only 300 to 400 ml of waste will be treated at the sewage plant, thus reducing the CO2 generated.

Evaluation
Comparison between low flush urinals and waterless urinals
Changi Airport is currently using low flush urinals in their male toilets which is their way of doing a part for the environment by reducing the water consumption. However, this urinals requires complicated plumbing works for water input and output which often prone to leaks or pipe erosion. Besides, low flush urinals are still not the best practices as it still uses up to 0.5L of water per flush. On the other hand, waterless urinals require only a drain pipe for its output and also does not require any water to flush and thus, able to save more water. (refer to Appendix B)

Limitations

Retrofits
For existing buildings to switch from conventional to waterless urinals, retrofitting is compulsory. Waterless urinals only require a drain line for the disposal of human waste. As a result, water pipes must be drained and capped to prevent damage to pipes. In addition to the removal of water pipes, as waterless urinals are installed differently from conventional urinals, adjustments to the drain line could be necessary. As a result, retrofitting is an integral part of installing waterless urinals to existing buildings.

More frequent maintenance required
Waterless urinal does not have flushing capability to remove debris and hair found in the urinal gradually. Hence, periodic maintenance required by cleaners to keep the waterless urinal clean.
Higher exposure risk
Due to the frequent maintenance of waterless urinals for debris and hair, cleaners will be exposed to the risk of urine splashing while cleaning the urinals, which is a health hazard.

References
https://www.brusselsairport.be/en/env/news/65030 (waterless urinal at brussel airport)
https://www.pub.gov.sg/savewater (water consumption assumption)